Just checked Polestar's website and with those wheels, the Polestar 3 claims 632 km of WLTP range, not 567 km. This means it actually lost 16% of its range, which is still decent but far from what you're saying. Based on that, the real consumption is around 20.15 kWh/100 km.
Meanwhile, the Tesla Model 3 averaged 14.13 kWh/100 km, which is impressive considering the weather conditions. If Tesla bumped up their battery density a bit, they'd be unbeatable in range too. Not just efficiency. Let’s be honest, 75 kWh is starting to feel a bit small by today’s standards. Fortunately in my country the weather is a lot better and so is the range.
MK, 17 Jan 2025Uf! With 37% larger battery it is easy. So Polestar 3 is 37% less efficient. Ups! Look look BM... morewell a 4WD Polestar PP SUV against long range RWD T, this is an amazing performance by Polestar 3 . Outstanding!
"Quick verification revealed that Tesla Model 3 added about 2.9 miles every 62 miles to its reading."
So the Tesla lied about how well it performed? I guess given Musk's record of false claims we shouldn't be surprised, but exaggerating how far it had gone is falsifying facts, which is worse than making over-optimistic predictions.
MK, 17 Jan 2025Uf! With 37% larger battery it is easy. So Polestar 3 is 37% less efficient. Ups! Look look BM... moreWell bigger battery, but check th size of the car))
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
RSS
Settings
Log in I forgot my password Sign up